Home > Uncategorized > Global Warming Fraud, Don’t Buy Into It.

Global Warming Fraud, Don’t Buy Into It.

The global warming cult has become so discredited I cannot believe people still buy into the fraud. If you take a look at all the proposed remediation methods they all involve the American taxpayer being forced to pay hundreds of billions of dollars to third world shitholes and massive job losses to American workers. And of course none of the other countries have to actually do anything they just promise that maybe someday they might do something. Take time to read the Paris & Kyoto agreements, you notice one common theme LETS FUCK AMERICA. Another little tidbit is the massive transfer of wealth to far left wing like Al Gore, Goldman Sachs and Clinton Inc.

In 2000 Gore’s wealth was around $700,000 by 2015 Gores est net worth was $172.5 million dollars. Between 2008 and 2011 Gore and his Goldman Sachs pals made $218 million with the Carbon Credit Ponzi scheme. According to the LA Times Elon Musk has received $4.9 billion in taxpayer subsidies. Boatloads of other Democratic donors and bundlers have also cashed in.

Elon’s Taxpayer haul

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hy-musk-subsidies-20150531-story.html

These folks all donated to Obama and Hillary and where handsomely rewarded, even after failure most walked away with millions.

  1. Evergreen Solar ($25 million)*
  2. SpectraWatt ($500,000)*
  3. Solyndra ($535 million)*
  4. Beacon Power ($43 million)*
  5. Nevada Geothermal ($98.5 million)
  6. SunPower ($1.2 billion)
  7. First Solar ($1.46 billion)
  8. Babcock and Brown ($178 million)
  9. EnerDel’s subsidiary Ener1 ($118.5 million)*
  10. Amonix ($5.9 million)
  11. Fisker Automotive ($529 million)
  12. Abound Solar ($400 million)*
  13. A123 Systems ($279 million)*
  14. Willard and Kelsey Solar Group ($700,981)*
  15. Johnson Controls ($299 million)
  16. Brightsource ($1.6 billion)
  17. ECOtality ($126.2 million)
  18. Raser Technologies ($33 million)*
  19. Energy Conversion Devices ($13.3 million)*
  20. Mountain Plaza, Inc. ($2 million)*
  21. Olsen’s Crop Service and Olsen’s Mills Acquisition Company ($10 million)*
  22. Range Fuels ($80 million)*
  23. Thompson River Power ($6.5 million)*
  24. Stirling Energy Systems ($7 million)*
  25. Azure Dynamics ($5.4 million)*
  26. GreenVolts ($500,000)
  27. Vestas ($50 million)
  28. LG Chem’s subsidiary Compact Power ($151 million)
  29. Nordic Windpower ($16 million)*
  30. Navistar ($39 million)
  31. Satcon ($3 million)*
  32. Konarka Technologies Inc. ($20 million)*
  33. Mascoma Corp. ($100 million)

*Denotes companies that have filed for bankruptcy.

http://dailysignal.com/2012/10/18/president-obamas-taxpayer-backed-green-energy-failures/

The weather may be changing but that’s why its called weather, its been changing since day one. Greenland is called Greenland because 10,000 years ago there was no ice there, I don’t think there were any coal plants back then. If you look at most of the global warming studies they all go back short periods like 200 years, their models come out quite differently when they study longer periods of history. In the 70’s the climate scientist where claiming we where all going to freeze to death. My local weatherman can’t get the 5 day weather forecast correct. Can’t say I put much faith in there predictions on the next 100 years. The dirty little secret about research scientist are in many circumstances there incomes are based on there research results. So during the past decade unless you advocated the man made global warming myth, you did not get a grant. Colleges have actually terminated climatologist researchers who push back on the myth.

Energy has changed more people’s lives than any other thing since the dawn of mankind. I think the 80 year women in India is better off with an electric powered washing machine in here home then without it. The the global warming crowd would rather she haul 50 pounds of clothes a mile down to the river where she can stand in the freezing water and wash her families clothes in yak shit infested water.

I am not saying we should not be addressing pollution and clean water here in the United States of America, but many of the issues can be addressed thru basic capitalism. People who demand clean energy  can buy it on their own, basically put there money where there mouths are. The taxpayers should not be subsidizing  clean energy or any energy for that matter including big oil. Taxpayers in the rust belt who have been decimated by the west coast tech boom should not have to subsidize solar panels and Tesla’s for millionaires at Google, Apple and Facebook. If the left does not want coal then maybe they should manufacture Iphone’s and other gadgets in West Virginia, Ohio and Pennsylvania. Pull workers out of the mines by paying them more then what they make in the mines. Maybe The Gates Foundation could fund STEM traing for Americans instead of building school’s for the LGBTQRTYFU crowd in India. Its time they quite bitching and invest in America, bring those hundreds of billions back to there home country.

Lies

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2015/02/09/top-10-global-warming-lies-that-may-shock-you/#16d306f053a5

Duped

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html

Fabricated Data

http://www.naturalnews.com/045695_global_warming_fabricated_data_scientific_fraud.html

Cooking The Books

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2017/02/07/federal-scientist-cooked-climate-change-books-ahead-obama-presentation-whistle-blower-charges.html

Proof Scientist Getting Rich

http://www.dailyclimate.org/tdc-newsroom/2015/02/climate-science-grant-money

97% Fraud

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/#3dd8c7513f9f

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/05/30/global-warming-alarmists-caught-doctoring-97-percent-consensus-claims/#657be904485d

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/425232/97-percent-solution-ian-tuttle

Cooks ‘97% consensus’ disproven by a new peer reviewed paper showing major math errors

http://dailycaller.com/2014/05/16/where-did-97-percent-global-warming-consensus-figure-come-from/

http://www.populartechnology.net/2014/12/97-articles-refuting-97-consensus.html

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: